Montana Bucks the Court

George Will, Washington Post
Montana uses an interesting argument to justify defiance of a Supreme Court decision: Because the state is particularly prone to political corruption, it should be trusted to constrict First Amendment protections of political speech.At issue is the court’s 2010 Citizens United decision, which held, unremarkably, that Americans do not forfeit their First Amendment rights when they come together in corporate entities or labor unions to speak collectively. What do liberals consider the constitutional basis for saying otherwise? 

Source: http://www.realclearpolitics.com/2012/05/31/montana_bucks_the_court_281190.html

verizon verizon 4G country financial